COMPARE
Tier1/AI vs traditional communications and point tools
Most teams still report what already happened. Tier1/OS is the capital markets communications OS: full seven-step loop Insights → Content → Distribution → Traffic → Identify → Communicate → Repeat. Gunner owns the gold half, with your sign-off on every outbound action. Built for public-company IR, agencies with public clients, and funds watching perception.
At a glance
| Traditional agencies | Tier1/AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary output | Quarterly reports, reactive updates | Gunner + seven-step loop · briefing, strategy periods, execution |
| Who sends | Consultants or ad-hoc staff | Your address - you approve every send and publish |
| Environment intelligence | Manual monitoring, fragmented tools | 77 sources, mentions, peers, catalyst scoring |
| Investor CRM | Spreadsheets or separate CRM | Unlimited contacts, engagement tied to campaigns |
| Time to value | Weeks of scoping and retainers | Day-one snapshot + ~two week white-glove onboard |
Vs HubSpot: Q4, and stacked SaaS
Full tier matrix, live meter, and vendor benchmarks (HubSpot: Mailchimp, Q4: Notified, communications retainers) live on the pricing hub - including unlimited contacts/seats vs per-contact and per-seat models.
See pricing, meter, and market comparison →
When Tier1/AI is the better fit
- You own communications for a public or pre-IPO issuer, a fund, or an agency book of clients, and the stack has become the job.
- You want forward-looking relationship cadence, not only a post-mortem after the quarter.
- You need capital-markets coverage without a full in-house relationship desk and six disconnected vendors.
- You will not delegate control of outbound - approval gates are non-negotiable.